Report guide

Read the signal.
Keep the context.

The V2 report is a structured view of a race, not a betting instruction. This guide explains what each layer contributes and how to interpret it without turning analysis into false certainty.

01 · Start here

A sensible race-reading workflow

Use the report to organise your investigation. The ranking is the starting point; confidence and context tell you how strongly to hold that view.

  1. Choose the race

    Use the track and race controls to move through the day. Check field size, code, surface, going and race type before focusing on a runner.

  2. Read the Hoofs Ranking

    The published report order is PLACE-led. Rank 1 is the model’s strongest all-round candidate, not a guaranteed winner.

  3. Check all three confidence ratings

    They answer different questions about the whole order, the first-ranked runner and the leading trio.

  4. Look for agreement and disagreement

    Component medals show which specialist models support a runner. Agreement is useful evidence; disagreement is useful uncertainty.

  5. Open the companion

    Review pace, setup, class, form, finishing profile and stable context before reaching your own conclusion.

Analysis, not instruction

Hoofs does not prescribe stakes, promise returns or sell a system. It gives you a consistent evidence framework for forming your own view.

02 · The order

What the Hoofs Ranking means

The Hoofs Ranking combines the usable signals from several specialist models into one coherent runner order. The published list is PLACE-led, with a separate WIN view used as a tie-break.

Hoofs Rank

The final PLACE-led report position. Lower is stronger.

Top-three set

The three runners the analysis rates most strongly overall.

Place-led

Designed around robust contender strength, not simply first-past-the-post probability.

Separate WIN view

Retained as additional evidence rather than replacing the report order.

03 · Reliability

Three ratings, three questions

Confidence is applied after the order is fixed. It describes expected reliability and never moves a runner up or down.

Overall Race Confidence

How much trust should you place in the overall shape and ordering of this race?

Top 1 Confidence

How likely is the first-ranked runner to achieve an official paid place? This is not a win probability.

Top 1–3 Confidence

How dependable is the leading trio as an ordered group? It is not simply “winner in the top three”.

Rating 1–10

A historical reference band. Ten means the strongest historical tenth for that question—not certainty.

Do not compare unlike scales

A 7/10 Overall rating and a 7/10 Top 1 rating describe different targets. Read each against the question printed above.

04 · Supporting views

What the model medals add

Medals are specialist opinions. They help reveal consensus and tension inside the report order, but they do not override the Hoofs Ranking.

V11
Broad form and context

Established profile, recent form, race conditions, official ratings and connections.

V12.2
Intent, conditions and tactical fit

Mark, class and trip movements, affinities, partnerships and the likely demands of today’s race.

V17.2
Pace, sectionals and race shape

How the contest may unfold through run style, speed, setup and sectional evidence.

V25
Connections and placement

Quieter signals in how horses are campaigned, entered and partnered.

HOOFS
Final Hoofs Ranking

Combines agreement, disagreement and race context into the published report order.

05 · Price context

Minimum-back prices

The WIN and PLACE minimum-back columns translate calibrated model chances into commission-aware exchange thresholds. They are not bookmaker forecasts.

How to read the number

A market price above the displayed threshold may indicate theoretical value under the model’s assumptions. It does not guarantee a return, remove uncertainty or account for every execution risk.

06 · The explanatory layer

Use the companion to challenge the rank

The companion adds readable context around pace, setup, class, ability, recent form, fitness, finishing patterns and stable performance. Its threat label is an explanatory flag—not another ranking model.

Pay particular attention when the leading runner appears pace-dependent, the race is described as chaotic, specialist models disagree, or confidence is low. Those are reasons to investigate, not inconvenient details to ignore.

Put the guide into practice

Open the latest V2 report and work through a race from rank to context.

Open latest report →